Probation should help the public, not profit
However, in 2015 the then Justice Secretary Chris Grayling pushed through the sell-off of 70% of this long time public service – the most extensive privatisation in the criminal justice system ever.
As a result, ill-considered and reckless moves towards privatisation have jeopardised the quality of probation work - which have worsened accountability, stretched workers and increased dangers to public safety.
What you need to know
- 70% of cases are low risk offenders, dealt with by 21 ‘Community Rehabilitation Companies’ (CRCs). These companies are tendered out to private organisations and are responsible for probation across a region of the country.
- 30% of cases are high risk offenders, which are all dealt with by our public National Probation Service.
What are the effects of privatisation?
Probation services were working well under public ownership: In 2013 the Ministry of Justice rated all 35 publicly owned probation trusts in England and Wales as good or excellent. But despite this, the services were privatised in 2015 without pilot schemes and in the face of widespread opposition.
In 2017, HM Inspectorate of Probation found that the NPS was protecting the public well, but that the private CRCs were failing in half of cases.
PRIVATE PROFITS OVER PUBLIC SAFETY
Conflicting interests - between public service and profit motives - also threaten public safety. Since privatisation, the number of convicts committing a serious further offence while under probation supervision has risen 20%.
CRCs are failing to meet 2/3rds of their targets on average - with the worst performing company only meeting 4 out of 24 target measures. These failures are a risk to the safety of the public and staff as well as the wellbeing and future of the offenders.
WORSE WORKING CONDITIONS AND LOWER STAFF MORALE
A report released in 2016 by Dr. Gill Kirton, which surveyed staff in CRCs, demonstrated that many staff have expressed concerns about increasing risks to their safety in working conditions. Since the sell-off, for example, working practices have become more isolated. Alongside this, open-plan offices have been introduced in many of the centres, meaning that probation officers often have to conduct sensitive interviews with offenders in front of their colleagues.
Union surveys show more than half of those working for private firms in the probation sector are now looking for new employment.
STRETCHED NATIONAL PROBATION SERVICE
Kirton’s report also discusses the impact of privatisation on the National Probation Service, which is still publicly owned. Now left to deal only with high-risk and harrowing cases, increasing levels of stress and mental health problems have been reported among staff – who used to have more of a balanced caseload.
Anonymous NPS worker: “I am concerned about my physical health … as well as my mental health. I have come back after two weeks off sick because I was concerned for my colleagues who are already in a very small team and were having to cover my cases in my absence. I did not return because I felt better.”
Staff of CRCs are also feeling the pressure. Sodexo announced huge staff cuts barely months after privatisation, meaning that the remaining staff are dealing with an unmanageable workload. Some junior officers in CRCs are now handling more than 200 cases each, despite 60 cases being the maximum it is recommended to handle safely.