Here's how to actually clean up our rivers and seas

3 December 2021

This year, the appalling scale at which water companies are dumping raw sewage into our waterways came to light. Following these revelations, it's clear that we need a thorough public inquiry into the disgraceful performance of the privatised water and sewage system in England and Wales.

The Environment Agency (EA) and OFWAT have just launched an investigation into sewage treatment works after water companies admitted to illegally releasing untreated sewage into rivers. But this doesn't go nearly far enough. These agencies have been part of the problem for decades, lacking the resources and will to regulate. Their investigation will be as useless as Yorkshire CCC claiming to have created an 'independent' inquiry into their own racism.

So what needs to happen?

Rebecca Pow, Minister for Nature Recovery and the Domestic Environment, should take responsibility for finding and appointing a panel which represents the public interest, with no relation to the private interests of the companies, and without connections to the failed regulators.

It should sit and hold hearings in every region of the England and Wales. The inquiry should create a proper public debate, with meetings and hearings live on the internet and all documents open to public scrutiny.

It should call witnesses:

  • from groups whose leisure activites or businesses have been damaged;
  • from consumer bodies on how much families have been overcharged for decades;
  • from ecologists on the damage to the environment;
  • from engineers on the technical adequacy of the companies' operations;
  • from public health researchers on how morbidity and mortality have been affected by the privatised system; 
  • from economists on how little the private owners have invested, how much they have extracted, and how successful they have been in turning OFWAT into a compliant servant of the companies rather than the public;
  • from international researchers on how other countries run their water and sewerage systems, and why noone else in the world has introduced a system like the English one;
  • from local councils on the growing frustration that they have no power or influence over the services which were taken out of their control by the Thatcher government and have been run by international financiers without any regard for the public interests of the English people;
  • and from water and sewerage workers and their unions about the realities of skimped operations and under-investment on the ground;
  • and the companies themselves and their distant owners should also be called, to offer their views on whether the system serves the public interest as well as it serves their own;
  • and the leaders of the EA and OFWAT should be asked to examine their own performance over three decades, and offer any coherent reasons for continuing with a system. 

The inquiry should be given terms of reference with a wide freedom to examine and recommend alternative possible policies.

Without this range of voices around the table, we will just end up with toothless conclusions that let private companies continue to get away with it for decades to come. We cannot go on with our communities cut out of the picture when considering the future of our local environments, our bills, our essential everyday water supply. 

It's time to stop private companies and regulators taking us for a ride.

The majority of the public want water in public ownership. Why?

If water belonged to all of us, money would stop leaking out of the system and into paying whopping dividends to shareholders. Instead, funds would be re-invested in upgrading infrastructure to protect our waterways from pollution. 

In Scotland, water is already in public ownership. Scottish Water delivers water and wastewater services for the whole of the country. It is run as a commercial company without government funding, but all profit is invested in better services. Bills are lower than in England and Scottish rivers and lakes are far cleaner. If the English companies had invested at the rate Scottish Water can because it is publicly owned, £28 billion more could have gone into the infrastructure that prevents sewage pollution.

If we're serious about cleaning up the mess that water companies have been spewing out at our expense, we need to go further than a slap on the wrist. We need to take our water into public hands. And a truly public inquiry is the first step. 

Do you believe in public services for people not profit?

Win campaigns for public ownership by subscribing to our mailing list! We'll hold your data in accordance with our privacy policy and send you carefully chosen information about current and future campaigns, projects and appeals. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Comments

Alison van Gemeren replied on

It is clear that water management is not a suitable activity for private enterprise. The market is a good tool for fast-changing and evolving services, but not for ones which demand steady monitoring, solicited and unsolicited investigations, large-scale investment and maintenance, and can cause slowly developing damage.

Rosemary Osmon replied on

The failures have been known for many years. Accountability has been non-existent. Government has been lax, if not compliant in this disaster.

ben parsons replied on

I'm complaining to united utilities tomorrow

Michael Rand replied on

Time for all utilities to be nationalised.

Steven Barrett replied on

It is clear from the Scottish experience that utilities such as water should be in public hands. The conflict between investig in cleaner water, repairing pipes/leaks, developing new plant to stop sewerage overspill is in direct conflict with providing shareholders with dividends.

Add new comment