We own Brexit: our 12 point plan for public ownership

Photo of Prime Minister Theresa May

17 January 2017

The Prime Minister's speech today made it very clear. Unless we take a stand, Brexit won't mean protecting our public services. They will be open for business from money-grabbing investors, tax dodgers and vulture companies as much if not more than now.

The number one reason people voted for Brexit was that they wanted decisions about the UK to be made in the UK. That means we need public services that are accountable to us, not to distant shareholders who put profit ahead of people. Our public services – from our NHS to our schools to our local parks – are under threat from cuts, outsourcing and sell offs. It doesn’t have to be this way.

Brexit could mean a fresh start - but it's already being hijacked by a corporate elite. We know that public ownership is hugely popular with the British public. Theresa May said today that Britain 'voted for change' and for a 'brighter future' for our children and grandchildren. We have 'an opportunity to step back and ask ourselves what kind of country we want to be'. So let's do that.

Whether you voted to leave or remain, Brexit gives us a chance to kickstart a debate about the future of the country we live in. Do we put our families and communities first, or would we rather make sure the shareholders are happy?

Our view? Theresa May should promise that Brexit will mean public ownership for all of us – and send the corporations packing. 

Here’s our 12 point plan to get us started on how to get the right deal for Britain. 

1) Celebrate our public NHS, stop the plans to Slash, Trash and Privatise it.

2) Bring our railways into public ownership – one franchise at a time. 

3) Bring water into public ownership, copy Scottish Water and examples from around the world.

4) Gradually replace the Big Six with local, public, community-owned and cooperative energy.

5) Celebrate public servants, no more failed austerity - fund public services properly (instead of blaming immigrants).

6) Make excellent education a right for all of us, not a privilege.

7) Protect our public and green spaces for our children and grandchildren.

8) Keep national public assets in our hands so we can all profit from their success.

9) Allow local councils to set up new public bus companies.

10) Call for an outsourcing exit – encourage councils to bring services in-house.

11) Make care for vulnerable children and older people a priority, not a profit-making opportunity.

12) Protect our public services in any new trade deals so they can be run in public ownership as people want them to be.

Like this plan? Share this page to spread the word. #OwnBrexit

Photo of Prime Minister Theresa May

Photo credit: U.S. Embassy London

Do you believe in public services for people not profit?

Win campaigns for public ownership by subscribing to our mailing list! We'll hold your data in accordance with our privacy policy and send you carefully chosen information about current and future campaigns, projects and appeals. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Comments

Michael K replied on Permalink

This campaign is maybe the only good thing related to Brexit. Lets discuss it guys!

Rosemarie replied on Permalink

My biggest concern is that after all that fighting to get rid of TTIP negotiations in Europe, Theresa May will be daft enough to offer Donald Trump bilateral TTIP. Which will hand over the NHS to American companies, as well as any other public companies they want to own!

Edith Dyas replied on Permalink

II think you missed out Housing . Bring back rent controls. At the same time local councils should be encouraged to build low rent social housing. To speed up the building programme facilitate the building of prefabricated houses, roofed with solar panels and rent them, or sell them at genuinely affordable rents. Bring in restrictions on how many houses one person, or company, can own. Bring in tighter controls about the the quality of rented homes so that they are inspected regularly to make sure that they are fit for habitation.

Raymond Attfield replied on Permalink

Yes very very important point and it is more than just 'housing' it is where and how we create the places in which we live. We have forgotten how to make cities for living in. Designed, planned, thoughtful cities, real cities not garden cities, would improve so many things, places for the elderly to live in supported communities and free-up hospitals, low rent homes for young people on the move in life, living near services, shops, public transport will cut out the dependence on cars etc etc.....we don't just live in housing but everywhere.

diana o,neill replied on Permalink

excellent work but remember housing and homelessness

Andy replied on Permalink

Go for it! We need to fight for what is right!

Valerie Druce replied on Permalink

Although I think most of the plan is good and I'm a strong Brexiters the one question I have is, how are we going to pay for bringing every thing back to public owner ship

Anonymous replied on Permalink

Collectively the British public had to bail out the private banking system to save the bankers which is hundreds of billions of pounds they increased our national debt to massive proportions, why don't we have a jubilee debt clearance on the the bankers QE money that went to shareholders, bonuses and Private bank balance sheets and bail out Brexit Britain..... also check out positive money and how to make sovereign, accountable, democratic money in the UK go positive money!!!

Annie Lawler replied on Permalink

There's plenty of money around, whatever we are being told. It's just being used for other things.

Stephen Brown replied on Permalink

Tax the stupidly rich and the shareholders who got £69 billion last year !

Brad Bell replied on Permalink

The economy can only grow if new money is created in the form of debt. Currently private banks create new money in the form of mortgages, by typing some numbers in a computer ledger and then charging interest on it.

Gov/Central Bank could create new money instead. 97% of money is digital so doesn't cost anything to create. But it is necessary for growth. We could inflate the value of public services instead of inflating the housing bubble.

I think of it this way: we can be in debt (to ourselves) as a nation and have great public services, or we can follow our current path and individually have mountains of 'personal' debt in bubble mortgages and student loans debt and healthcare debts - and the public services of a feudal hamlet.

If we can bail out the banks continuously for a decade, we can pretty much finance anything we want.

Benc replied on Permalink

There is plenty of money got through taxation just look at the annual reports of Capita, Serco, Atos, Keolis, G4S. You might be a Brexiter, but you surely don't believe all this outsourcing saves taxpayers' money do you?

Cheryl replied on Permalink

Umm - stopping this Government from wasting our money would be a massive help. They operate as if they believe the purpose of people is to serve businesses, not the other way around.

So in no particular order (and there are many more options) they could:

* stop being hell-bent on destroying the NHS, and everything publicly owned, by forcing privatisation on everything they can get away with. Guess what, private companies need to make a profit, so cost more and are less efficient, even to the point of incompetence. Plus the strategy get in the way of actually prioritising the nation's health - and worst of all it sets up OUR NHS to be rapidly transformed into a USA style insurance system, unless we stop them.

* stop HS2 - it's a white elephant, to save 20 minutes on the longest journey. I wonder who will manufacture the new trains, where and for how much?

* re-build our industrial base, to reduce unemployment and all its related costs, to have a real impact on large areas of the UK, plus save on the need to import so much from far afield, as vast numbers of container ships pump out their pollution relentlessly at great cost to the environment

* not signing up to unethical EU type trade deals that, apart from being a method of pitting workers wages in one part of the world against those elsewhere, steal away democracy by allowing Corporations to sue Governments for vast sums through ICS and ISDS court systems, should they dare to act in the best interests of their people by introducing changes which might limit the profit of a business. The effect of these prosecutions around the world has often been to 'freeze' the legislatlive process as governments fear being sued They cannot of course sue the Corporations in return.

* stopping vanity projects e.g. the Garden Bridge, which has already had public funds and would be a nice little earner for private backers, if it's ever built

* not replacing Trident submarines that won't be used to house nuclear weapons anyway,

* bailing out banks, without charging proper interest when they are effectively 'overdrawn', aka in debt to us

* stopping the biggest culprits from tax-dodging, especially those multinational businesses that make most of their profit here but put their head offices off-shore to avoid tax,

* reverse reductions in taxes for the richest 1 to 10% of the population

Terry Davies replied on Permalink

Its my understanding the private sector has renewable franchises and compensation is not payable to franchisees if the franchise is not renewed after it expires. Thus all franchises can be returned to public sector bids by comissioners. However if TTIP or CETA regulations apply then compensation is payable after court determinations. Is this true????

Margaret Linden replied on Permalink

You will be paying whether private or public. When private providers provide services they are paid with public money i.e. Taxes. They are not necessarily more efficient (unless you consider low pay no benefits employment efficient) - profit is primary motive. Even worse once they have control they are usually much more expensive than previously. Energy prices and rail prices a prime example. I am old enough to remember thatchervgovernment telling country private energy would bring down bills and private rail would bring down fares!

Neville Ward replied on Permalink

Paying for it all is easy: We just stop giving money to bankers. QE for the people.

Charles Batten replied on Permalink

Far BETTER that we ARE paying whatever we HAVE to, in order to sustain OUR Public SERVICES - get rid

of the OVER paid 'fat cat' fascist executives together with the PROFITEERING stock-market 'pirates'

and CONCENTRATE on providing the SERVICES we ALL have paid FOR since the original conceptions . . . .

Keith Norfolk replied on Permalink

You might as well ask all Conservatives to ''cross the floor''and join the Labour Party.As long as we have Tories in power there is not a hope in Hell of achieving any of those 12 points,none of them fit the Tory ideal.

John Ashmore replied on Permalink

Although my principles are with most of your 12 'ideal' objectives, I have to agree with Keith, that there is no chance of achieving most of them with a tory government.

Annie Lawler replied on Permalink

There is only one thing that is certain. If we don't try and make things work our way and just give up, there is no chance. If we shoot for the moon, we might just hit the stars and see at least some of the changes we want.

Brian Preece replied on Permalink

I'd love to see this get traction, but if the UK government carries out its threat to make Britain a banana republic, I don't see how it can. If company taxation is lowered to tax haven levels and the corporates are allowed to run riot, how is this practical? Sorry to be negative

tom replied on Permalink

Excellent stuff , go for it with, you all the way and get rid of fracking

Colin Brown replied on Permalink

Excellent work guys.

You and other members have identified the problems.Now can we see a plan of action for each of the individual items rather than a global plan where the fittest or most popular takes precedence

David replied on Permalink

Those on the right continually tell us that anything looking like socialism doesn't work and yet there are many examples of cooperatives around the world that disprove that particular piece of #fakenews! The best example is Mondragon in Spain set up by a Catholic priest to try and do something about the unemployment which was decimating the surrounding villages after the civil war and is now a multi million industry that survived the recession better than some other organisations and tries to retain the democratic principals outlined by the founders http://www.mondragon-corporation.com/eng/

Andrew Adams replied on Permalink

The CONservatives don't want publicly owned services because they can't make a fast buck then for themselves and their cronies and I firmly that publicly owned and run services benefits millions not just the privileged few.

Cheryl C replied on Permalink

Yep,

“Solidarity is the powerful lever that multiplies our strengths”- J. M. Arizmendiarrieta,

John Wilkins replied on Permalink

I endorse the comments of others about housing. Social Housing and rent controls have to be high on the list.

Vivienne King replied on Permalink

Yes excellent , go for it. 'All that evil requires to flourish is that good men do nothing' Well here good men and women are certainly doing something- you have all my support.

Peter Todd replied on Permalink

Fully support the 12 point plan Would have liked to have seen something on housing more of a priority than water

Bruce Pentreath replied on Permalink

I think we should also push extremely hard for a sovereign investment fund - had this been done when North Sea Oil was first discovered, we would be in a VERY different position now.

jean wilson replied on Permalink

How right you are, Bruce. E.g. Norway

Peter Smith replied on Permalink

The Public are not informed of the privatisation which is currently going on. My MP John Spellar has written to me confirming that since 2010 £37.7 billion of state assets have been privatised. We should demand lists of all the privatisations as they take place so that they are not slipped through without the publics knowledge.

P Smith

Roger Morgan replied on Permalink

I've just watched David Hall's analysis of electricity. I can go along with much of what he proposes - for example, much of South Africa's electricity distribution is municipally based. Though one does wonder what municipality would supply the Highlands, or the mountains of Wales, or the Sperrin Hills - in South Africa it is Eskom, rather than a municipality, that supplies the rural areas. But he neglects an important technical issue. Someone has to control the grid, by which I mean to balance the input and output power. If you don't do that, the frequency will not be stable, and there is a possibility of unscheduled outages (power cuts). Having one or more large-scale providers of generation, which might be pumped storage, or fuel-burning, or nuclear, or renewable, or all of these, makes that a lot easier. Is that still going to be the Big Six, or do we have a renaissance of the Central Electricity Generating Board, or does Natoinal Grid Plc continue with its present controlling role, perhaps with a responsibility for generation as well? We need to know.

Vee Soar replied on Permalink

There are already several small companies, which mostly give prominence to renewables. Those not already co-operatives should become so. Equally many villages have gone solar and are reaping the benefits. Locally generated power is the answer, so that each area has its own supply - which reduces the losses made with long supply lines. Government must be made to see that removing the subsidy for self solar is madness when we need to generate as much as we can locally. Companies should be encouraged to use the roofs of their large buildings for solar which would provide their own power AND some for houses nearby.

Neil Palmer replied on Permalink

Although I agree as a long term goal there would be issues of reliability of supply. What voltage would local generated power operate at, would this have require transformers, would it be synchronised to the grid? Once upon a time there was the CEGB and local boards. It worked fine and made reasonable profits, but it didn't fit the political philosophy of the time.

Terry Davies replied on Permalink

240volts is the national voltage for domestic use. no need to change these when energy franchises are renationalised.

Mary Bowman replied on Permalink

just to say how much I agree with Vere about renewables

Peter Todd replied on Permalink

We should adopt the Dutch model on housing Local authorities buy up land at pre development values put in the infrastructure and then sell on the land to house builders at development values This would fund local authority social housing

Rb replied on Permalink

Or we could instigate the land value tax and kill two birds with one stone.

Peter Todd replied on Permalink

Would include the the policy of a universal income currently being trialled in Finland

Tony Leather replied on Permalink

I agree with everything you've said, but to avoid getting into this mess again we desperately need constitutional reform. This government was elected to power with the support of just 1 in 4 of the UK electorate. Brexit had the support of 38% of the UK electorate.

EVERY VOTE MUST COUNT for democracy to survive and thrive! If we ignore minorities they can seek extreme solutions (e.g. independence for Scotland). We are only better together if we all feel part of the same team.

Raymond Attfield replied on Permalink

It is an important beginning. It needs to be stronger and would grow stronger if part of an alliance with other like minded groups. Who are they? Greens, Liberals, environmental groups? Can the idea be discussed together?

Harry Bird replied on Permalink

Fabulous set of principles, sadly you have no chance with this lot of achieving even a fraction of them. Not even a snowball in hell's, Good luck with it, Little Britain Brexit.

Edith Robson replied on Permalink

Mad idea. I don't think it has a snowball's chance. But anything that tries to control Brexit has my vote. Thank you.

Ian P Kane replied on Permalink

Legislate so that local government can compulsorily buy up farming land at agricultural prices for future building of council properties and affordable housing with any profits being re-invested in infrastructure and future housing projects. I agree with Raymond to achieve the above there has to be a progressive alliance.

Sylvia Lumley replied on Permalink

Compulsery purchace of farming land!! I don't think robbing the farmers who grow our food, look after the environment, and can only sell their produce now to the big supermarkets for practcally cost price, is the answer to the housing problems.

Patrick Elsdale replied on Permalink

Good work, 12 step plan.......sounds familiar to AA, weaning our government off their sycophantic addiction to snouting up to big money.

Another thing that is not helping is that apparently councils are not allowed to go and get a mortgage, build affordable housing and rent it out. If it works for thousands of (mainly?) Tory voters why should it not work better when done properly and with standards. This way there is an alternative to private landlords that should, in time bring up the standards and enable the councils to help finance services by selling off houses as required.

Rex Hora replied on Permalink

Valerie Druce asks "how are we going to pay for bringing everything back to public ownership?" That's easy, we do it the same way it was done in the 1940s. We don't need any cash, we just issue government stock in exchange for the shares. This will increase public borrowing but that's a good thing, not a bad one. Pension funds can, in future, be invested in government stock, not shares, so they will be far less at risk from falls in share prices. This win-win situation is a secret that capitalists don't want people to know.

Annie Lawler replied on Permalink

I agree with the comments on housing and have to say, this is the first time that I've heard anything exciting come out of the Brexit debate. This is a real opportunity to bring our fractured country back together again and find what unites us.

Please let me know what I can do to help to make this happen and to spread the news.

Linda Milk replied on Permalink

Go for it! I'm fed up with the negative moaners of this wonderful country. A country is only as good as its people, so let's ALL go ahead with a more positive attitude, and be proud of this land of ours. The British have achieved and overcome so much in the past - we can do it again!

Helen replied on Permalink

Yes, this would be very positive.

However, Re: point 11 - Please could you add ill & disabled people to this group, we nearly always just get completely forgotten. Ill & disabled people have been consistently targeted by government & are suffering greatly.

David A Miller replied on Permalink

Great point to start from. Recommend that the 12 points are strengthened regularly by taking on the best new ideas. Is there room for other models of ownership eg partnerships such as exemplified by John Lewis? What about wrapping it all in a vision of sovereign wealth which isn't only a tax on an exploitable natural resource?

Larry M replied on Permalink

No matter whether you voted in or out this is a chance to shape how it goes, and the 12 point plan is a great start. I'd also want to see a real living wage and reduced inequalities in there.

Lets get out there and get people talking

Sally Stone replied on Permalink

It's going to happen anyway, Id much rather this way than any other.

Housing and rent control would be part of my plan though.

Alan Johnson replied on Permalink

I agree with the 12 points and those added by the comments but, before we can begin to achieve any of those goals, we first need an effective Labour Party, as committed as it was in 1900, to representing the working class.

Branka Young replied on Permalink

We need to democratize politics and our society if we don't want to end up living in a corporate-run world that works for 1% of the most wealthy people only. Now is the time to act - you just need to look at other countries in Europe like Denmark to realize that nationalizing services that benefit everybody will increase average income across the entire society and therefore stimulate economic growth. Theresa May's government will only make the income & wealth of the 1% grow which will eventually destroy our economy and our society

tony cave replied on Permalink

We have a country that works for a minority and at the expense of the majority.

linda replied on Permalink

Brexit warrants a unity government, not the political punch and judy scenario.

That would

- force more transparency

- which would force a more public interest Brexit rather than a behind the scenes, City of London financial services Brexit - which is what we'll get with party rivalry and accompanying secrecy

- and it would also require the Labour Party leadership to come up positive contribution to be in it.

Anonymous replied on Permalink

In-source tradesmen: plumbers, joiners, electricians etc, to the local councils' workforce to service not only council housing but paid service to private housing to help protect people from 'cowboy tradesmen' and 'rip-off merchants'.

Tom replied on Permalink

I am an old Hippie (a few of us left) we were against the capitalist establishment in the sixties, all but suibsumed in the coporate world by material offerings. I hope that this mevement has greater success and holds to the principals of openess and equality even if that is based on a form of meritocrity. I will support all the above but with a measure of realism, the corporate world will do all to destroy your wishes.

Keith replied on Permalink

We have complete nonsense of hundreds of acres of MOD land being sold; to modernise army operations apparently, yet contained within is accommodation and kitchens; with refurbishment, ideal for cat c prisoners and existing MOD staff waiting to pick up P45 and the irony is the government is recruiting former service personnel to prison service! No, government is waiting with anticipation at thought of new prisons services being fought over by private sector as they did when catering was handed over to monopoly of suppliers for armed services who are trained to cook!

Colin Pell replied on Permalink

Wow, a"big society" with a "big advance for people power" - David Cameron 2010. Actions speak louder than words!

Roderick Thirke... replied on Permalink

This looks like a much clearer and more precise programme than we've had from Labour. Perhaps they should adopt it? Adding protection for the workers' rights that the EU has 'forced' on us.

Marla replied on Permalink

It can happen, if enough people get behind it

Let's make lots of noise.

David Hall replied on Permalink

This is a really good initiative, trying to seize the energy of the resentment underlying Brexit and redirecting it away from xenophobia and instead to building new democratic public services. All us supporters of Weownit should think how we can get involved in this process. Three comments: 1. I agree with all the others saying that housing should be one of the key points 2. Valerie Druce asked how do we afford it: part of the answer is by borrowing,as Rex Hora says, but part is also by not buying everything currently owned by private corporations e.g. not coal-fired power stations, and part is by creating new systems which just by-pass the private companies e.g. new municipal energy supply companies 3. Roger Morgan said the electricity system needs a central grid management as well as local participation and ownership of generation: I agree, see the full report on making electricity public at www.psiru.org

Ieuan Einion replied on Permalink

People ask how will we find the money to nationalise/renationalise industries/utilities - as well as to improve and democratise health and education. There's one way of killing several birds with one stone, which is to nationalise and re-nationalise without compensation, or with minimal compensation in cases of dire need. The money that has been used to buy shares in privatised industries is, for the most part, money that should have been paid in tax and invested in health and education long before now, had Britain been anything like a civilised country. We should be asking all political parties to include a policy pledge that in any case, henceforth NO compensation will be paid to privateers and pirates, so that dabbling with capitalism and making money from people's deprivation and misery becomes a bit more like Russian Roulette. Richard Branson, please take note.

Wendé Anne Maunder replied on Permalink

Please go ahead with your 12 point plan. It accords with my own hopes for the future of our country.

Wendy Haggerty replied on Permalink

I totally agree with everything you said I would also add housings to the list . What is needed now is getting the media on side ( one that is not in the pocket of the Government) to get as many people on side . Let's hope we can get enough support as possible

Sue Mullins replied on Permalink

I agree with all the comments particularly remembering to include rent controls, housing and effective homelessness policies and an expectation that the cooperative energy companies invest in renewable energy above all else.

Graham Eaton replied on Permalink

I had a fit when I found out about the shady way taxes on profits aren't paid by Thames Water. Then I found out who have the major shareholdings in it - they are all organisations and people that are not worthy to make profit out of OUR water! All they do is process OUR water and resell it to US with an enormous PROFIT. A very simple operation. Presently, the leakage through worn or burst pipes has been reported to be at its highest ever! When it was privatised in the eighties, the advent of the Common Market was blamed on the sale of this to private operators.

The prices to the consumer have gone through the roof to raise enormous profits for a badly run simple operation. It is a State monopoly! There is no competition in the marketing process! Surely, this has to be taken back by the local authorities or the State to enable the consumer lower pricing!

Martyn replied on Permalink

Our Government is determined to outsource or privatise anything and everything despite the evidence in prisons, probation, the NHs, transport, water and energy that it doesn't work and doesn't benefit the UK taxpayer. We Own It have taken the electorate's desire to leave the EU and govern itself but our Government would rather no deal with the EU than a bad deal and would seek to turn the UK into a low wage tax haven for the rich and powerful. Brits abroad are left in an uncertain position as are people who have made the UK their home over the years. We Own It have ideas that offer some hope and positivity for the future based on long-term planning rather than the short-term policies pursued by our Government.

Mick Calvert replied on Permalink

Excellent 12 point plan but need to add: Cancel all anti-trade union legislation and fight to build stronger, more democratic unions.

Maurice Spurway replied on Permalink

I've always been a supporter of reclaiming the commons. The 12 point plan seems a good place to start. I support it.

Sarah O'Brien replied on Permalink

I think this looks desirable, achievable and inspiring.

Sam Darby replied on Permalink

The Brexit vote was a move away from unity with the other peoples of the world.Despite the problems in the EU we need to find a way to reverse the vote.We are unlikely to have any success in altering the terms of Brexit with the 12 campaign proposals, but they are in general good proposals that we need to be campaigning for with the general public if we are to see a government that will implement the proposals. Unless Labour forms a pact with the SNP,Greens, Plaid Cymru, Sinn Fein and the Lib Dems, we shall be stuck with the Tories for amny years yet.

Margaret replied on Permalink

I agree with Sylvia Lumley do not compulsory purchase true farming land how are you going to feed everyone, I know that a lot of our food comes from abroad but it should not, we should grow more for our own consumption, the unfortunate thing is that most farming land is owned by the well heeled, not the actual farmers but the ones in power it is a tricky situation created by people who little knew the later consequences of their actions as they deemed it theirs to give away in return for favours. sorry the last bit has nothing to do with the subject but I thought I would throw it as interest in the discussion.

Charles Hutchison replied on Permalink

Water privatisation in Scotland was mentioned in the Govan by-election of 1988. Though quickly dismissed.

Andrew Clubb replied on Permalink

So far I think Thersa May is on the right track well ahead of her detractors. I would like to see everyone concentrating on getting the best deal in the negotiations, certainly voice their opinions but stop rubbishing details they do not really have.

Julie Hudson replied on Permalink

I agree that accessible housing needs to be included in this list, other than that, BRILLIANT!

Cat replied on Permalink

Thanks so much for all the comments - we really appreciate your support.

We've read every comment and we'll use them to help us to develop our 12 point plan (for example by including housing).

Add new comment